The beaches stay closed, that’s the decision.
The explanation given to us is the following: “the migratory flow from the regions at risk must be stopped, and not being able to control all movements, it is necessary to suppress the desire for movement”.
Could this be a valid motivation for such a restriction on our freedom?
A radical choice that shouldn’t surprise us much after all the violations we have already suffered. In fact, since Covid-19 appears, what emerges is an extreme state of fear thanks to which all the extraordinary and unconstitutional decisions that undermine our primary freedoms as human beings are excused.
Each of us is concerned, as always, about his own situation. In this way, those who need access to the beach for professional or recreational reasons, get upset and shout injustice, while those who suffer an advantage from the law, being able to continue to work or enjoy their sport, remain silent hoping to benefit as much as possible.
This is absurd. But it’s the result of an individualistic society.
What worries me, and I hope the majority of the population, is how far they will be able to deprive us of these freedoms, which we should legitimately claim
When an extraordinary decision is taken contrary to these freedoms, provided that it is justified and limited in time, it makes sense. But if laws are enacted after terrorizing people and no one (who commands us) is able to circumscribe, not even vaguely, the problem, it is normal to question the real motivations behind such violations.